| dc.description.abstract |
The selection of the EIGRP routing protocol claims to have a fast convergence time which plays a very vital role in dealing with changing network topology conditions. Another reason is that theoretically EIGRP is the only routing protocol that has a backup route feature and its metric determination uses complex calculations based on IPv6 and IPv4 addresses. The research methodology used is literature study, analysis and design of the EIGRP routing simulation design system on IPv4 and IPv6, system implementation with the Cisco Packet Tracer application, testing and implementation, and preparation of research reports. Based on the ping test on IP V4, a total average of 40ms was obtained and on IP V6 it was obtained 45ms, so it can be concluded that based on the ping test, IP V4 is 5ms faster in sending packets. Whereas in the Tracert / Traceroute test on IP V4, the average PC0 was 2.86ms, PC1 3.96ms, R1 1.55ms, and R4 1.55ms, while on IP V6 the obtained Average PC0 was 3.33ms, PC1 3.93ms, R1 6.22ms, and R4 2.55ms , so it can be concluded that the time needed for IP V4 to send packets is faster than IP V6.
Keywords: IP Address, Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4), Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6), Tracert, Ping, Parameter Ping, Traceroute, Routing EIGRP
| en_US |
