| dc.description.abstract |
To plan a project budget, the estimator must have a method that is economical and clearly applicable in Indonesia. The benefits of an Estimator depend on the ability to make cost estimates. If the price bid submitted in the bidding process is too high, chances are the Estimator will experience defeat. Conversely, if you win an auction with a price that is too low, you will experience difficulties behind the day, therefore estimates of costs play an important role in the implementation of projects to plan and control resources such as material, labor, services and time. In Indonesia there are methods for planning project budget unit costs, namely BOW (Burgelijke Openbare Werken), SNI 2008 and AHSP 2016. Contractors generally make bid prices based on analysis that are not entirely guided by BOW (Burgelijke Openbare Werken) analysis, SNI 2008 and AHSP 2016. Contractors are more likely to calculate the unit price of work based on their own analysis based on previous experience in completing a construction work. This study aims to find out what method is the most economical and to be a reference for estimators to designate the cost of construction with the method that applies in Indonesia not by the method analyzed by it self. In calculating the budget plan for the development of the Religious Affairs Office Subsdistrict Lingga Bayu by using 2 methods, the 2016 AHSP method which is Rp. 1.077.200.000, then the 2008 SNI method was Rp. 1.181.800.000
Keywords: SNI 2008, AHSP 2016.
| en_US |
